All in the name of road safety
All in the name of road safety!
Debkumar Bhadra
I was driving my way back home, when a policeman, at about half past five in the evening, walked across the poorly lit stretch of road near the entry gate of Primary Health Centre (PHC) Wimberly Gunj and stood before my vehicle. I cautiously pulled over avoiding both the policeman at the front and the 4 wheeler driven on my rear. Aapka license dikhaiye/आपका लाइसेंस दिखाइये (show your license) he said. I complied. It was no surprise he could not read a single word from the diving license (DL). Even I couldn’t read the name plate on his uniform in the absence of proper street lighting. Upon asking his name, he simply said he is a police constable.
In a while two more constables, dodging a couple of vehicles, crossed the road making it three of them. I asked if anyone among them could educate me under which section of Motor Vehicle (MV) Act, police constables have been authorized to stop vehicles on the road or ask production of vehicle papers without any officer present on the spot. One of them said we constables being lowest in the rank are supposed to obey our superiors and we are just doing that.
This particular stretch of road between Government Senior Secondary School (GSSS) and PHC Wimberly Gunj is repaired several times a year, yet remains pothole ridden throughout the year. Further it being a right angle turning with three branch roads and presence of several tall trees with thick canopy blocking even the tiny speck of moonlight, combined with non-functional street lights make it a dreaded stretch for motorists. Upon asking whether those responsible for such apparently shoddy maintenance compromising safety of road users, has any penalty been imposed or challan issued as per the new provisions of amended MV Act 2019. The third one intervened saying it is not their duty; we are not issuing challan – we are only checking driving license; indicating they were fully aware they did not have the authority under MV Act, yet they were seen carelessly walking across the poorly lit road, waiving bare hands at moving vehicles, stopping and asking production of vehicle documents, all in the name of road safety.
The place where the police constables stationed themselves is a deliberately chosen spot where street lights are either absent or non-functioning and the road takes a sharp turn thus obscuring visibility from either side. Also safety gears such as warning LED flashlight traffic baton, retro reflecting vests, head gear, traffic cone, barricade with retro-reflecting sticker or any other safety arrangement which could fore-warn approaching motorists of police deployment was completely absent. That is how they think they can spring a surprise forgetting that by operating from such blind spots, they are basically putting their as well as others life at risk.
Let me cite another
instance. Recently a press
release carried in various local
dailies informed, High-tech Speed Laser Gun has been introduced
in the city as well as NH-4 and those found over speeding has been challaned. It
is no secret that speed limit signs are a rarity as far as island roads are
concerned. Thus discussed the issue with a learned advocate who on an earlier
occasion successfully defended a speed violation case. He added, the defendant
(A&N Police) during the trial could not produce any document specifying
speed limits applicable to islands. Following this I searched the web space but
couldn’t find any document prescribing
speed limits for A&N Islands. Thereafter got in touch with DySP (Traffic) who
was kind enough to share a 20 year old notification
wherein 40 kmph has been prescribed for LMV, 35 kmph for
Scooter/Motorcycles/Mopeds, 30 kmph for HGV/Passenger Busses and 25 kmph for
Autorikshaw applicable for vehicles plying within Port Blair Municipal Area. How
far the upper limit of 35 kmph for 2 wheelers and 25 kmph for 3 wheelers, has
been successful in maintaining smooth movement of vehicles, I prefer to leave
it for the authorities to look into it.
When asked for gazette
notification on speed limits for roads beyond Port Blair municipal area, I have
been given to understand no such document exist as on date and that the committee formed
in this regard is yet to submit its report. Till such time, limits prescribed
by MoRTH are being followed. Meaning without appropriate notification or road road signages in place as prescribed under MV
Act, motorists are being penalized, all in the name of road safety.
There is no disagreement that vehicles driven at greater speed need greater distance to stop and error in judgement tends to be higher, multiplying the risk as well as severity in case of an accident. At the same time, it is also true that un-necessary slow movement of vehicles is not at all desirable since it leads to piling of vehicles causing traffic snarls.
It is for this reason, depending upon type of road, vehicle and safety aspect in mind, different speed limits are prescribed under MV Act for different class of vehicles. Also Sec 112 of MV Act stipulates notification of such speed restrictions in the official gazette and by causing appropriate traffic signs to be placed or erected at suitable places so that drivers are able to comply with those restrictions and avoid creating a safety issue on the road.
While motorists are expected to follow rules framed under MV Act, it is equally important and binding upon concerned authorities that applicable rules are notified in the official gazette, publicized in local media and prominently displayed at appropriate spots in the manner prescribed under law so that motorists and other road users are able to make themselves aware of those provisions and comply with them.
Evidence suggests crash helmet’s protection ability is limited to marginal reduction in impact in case of simple, low speed falls. Helmets do not prevent neck injuries and in fact may increase them due to the additional weight. Particularly in the case of pillion riders, specifically children, women folks and senior citizens there is every chance that the additional load of the helmet could result in neck injury even in case of simple falls. Also contrary to attributed benefits, helmet lessens peripheral vision and the ability to hear which could make situation worse.
Similarly there is no scientific evidence suggesting carrying DL, insurance, RC or PUC has any bearing vis-à-vis road safety. Yet enforcement agencies are seen employing every tip and trick including risking, hiding behind sharp bends and operating from blind spots to catch minor traffic related violations overlooking the real reasons behind accidents in the city.
Road safety is a multi-sector, multi-dimensional subject requiring reforms and interventions in several areas. The first is education about traffic norms and safety rules. Second is robust road engineering and post-crash emergency response, the last is enforcement of rule provisions leading to penalising the offenders. Unfortunately when it comes to the first two, the zeal seems missing. For example following introduction of Speed Laser Guns, atleast three press release has come detailing number of violators booked and challan amount collected from them. Had curbing over speeding or safety of motorists and other road users been the motive behind the initiative, authorities could have used the opportunity to educate and make people aware of the applicable speed limits. But not a single word has been spoken on this count ensuring motorists remain in dark and end up on the other side of law.
Occasional checking of DL and vehicle documents is perfectly alright. But to make it everything of road safety, at the cost of overlooking the real factors responsible for accidents is fraught with fallacies. It is for this reason despite several amendments and manifold increase in the quantum of fines, our problems instead of getting resolved have only exacerbated.


Comments