Empty strip of tablet sold
TABLETS
MISSING FROM BLISTER STRIP; RETAILER REFUSES TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINT, CONSUMER
LEFT WITH HOBSON’S CHOICE
Mr Somen wanted to purchase some medicines for his wife, prescribed
by a Doctor.
He purchased those Medicines from a reputed pharmaceutical shop near Ganesh Temple at Aberdeen Bazaar. The prescribed dose of 30 tablets was
supplied to him in 3 blister strips containing 10 tabs each against
cash bill.
After consumption of 20
tablets, his wife picked up the third
strip and pushed open the first blister and surprisingly found it empty. Puzzled
she opened the second location which also was found empty. Thereafter both of
them examined each of the remaining blisters and found all of them to be empty;
ie tablets were missing from each of the 10 blisters in the strip.
He visited the pharmaceutical shop the next day along
with the empty strip, cash memo and narrated the shocking discovery. After
inspection, the shopkeeper said since the strip was broken, post sales
complaint cannot be entertained. Mr Somen explained, since the strip was backed by aluminum
foil on both sides, visual detection of the fault stood over-ruled. Hence, only
after breaking the blister it was found to be empty. To reassure, they had to
break open the second location which also was empty. Therefore the remaining 8 blister locations were
not opened but physically examined and found empty.
Despite the concrete evidence in hand, the shopkeeper
declined to accept deficiency in service and put the blame on the manufacturer.
She informed the defective strip would be sent to the company at mainland and only
if the company sends a replacement, it could be given to the customer. The shopkeeper
also insisted that if he needs those 10
tablets, fresh payment has to be made
forthwith.
Mr Somen, born and brought up in these islands was
aware taking up the matter with the manufacturer at mainland, (however rigorous
the follow-up be) would take at-least a couple of fortnights, if not months. Further
being employed as a Junior Radiographer in a Govt Hospital for more than a decade and a half, he was well aware
how important it is for the patient to follow the dose and the schedule
prescribed by the doctor.
It was quite a bit disturbing that a pharmaceutical
retailer which had been in the business of selling life saving drugs for long
could offer such a remedy (to wait indefinitely for the mainland based
manufacturer to replace the empty strip of medicine) which if followed could
result in loss of time causing ir-reparable damage to the health and well being
of the patient. All those Chemists, Druggists, Pharmacists, Paramedics and their likes dealing with medicines and
health care services are expected to be well aware of the importance of following
the dose/schedule prescribed by doctor.
Mr Somen therefore decided he would not be swayed by
the un-professional attitude of the retailer, hence opted to buy another set of
tablets. He was taken aback, as the retailer informed that only 5 tablets were
available with the shop. Whereas, to complete the prescribed dose 10 tablets were
needed. He thus purchased 10 tablets from another shop and returned home with a
shocking story to tell.
Readers will agree the trauma faced by Mr Somen and his wife isn’t
one of its kind. Many such incidents occur, but say it “ignorance” on the part
of the consumer towards its rights or “reluctance” to stand for its rights, the
one flouting norms could afford duping consumers on their face. Mr Somen has preferred
a written complaint which the shopkeeper received, but did not reply. He is now
contemplating to put the matter before the consumer forum. We shall follow the
developments in the days to come.
Comments